![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ...
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:34:29 +0000 (GMT)
What am I missing here, OC48=2.5Gb, OC192=10Gb, theres native 1GigE, native 10GigE So whats good about this? On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Dave Israel wrote:
On 3/7/2003 at 14:57:22 -0500, Eric Germann said:http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/03/07/speed.record/index.html Comments folks?Yeah. Give me a million dollars, plus fiber from here to anywhere, and let me muck with the TCP algorithm, and I can move a gig-e worth of traffic, too. -Dave
Current thread:
- 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Eric Germann (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... David G. Andersen (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Marshall Eubanks (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... fingers (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Matt Zimmerman (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 07)
- Re: 923 Mbps across the Ocean ... Dave Israel (Mar 07)