Re: ISPs are asked to block yet another port

["Peter E. Fry" <pfry () swbell net>]

Sean Donelan wrote:
> http://www.lurhq.com/popup_spam.html
>
> "LURHQ Corporation has observed traffic to large blocks of IP addresses on
> udp port 1026. [...]

  I haven't (yet) seen any scans of port 1026, but looking at my (home)
logs I have seen several with a fixed source port of 1026 (destination
of 137).  Heh.

Peter E. Fry