nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd)
From: "Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:48:05 +0300
value is dependant on the individual. Unfortunately, end user's cannot just highlight and hit delete on spam. They must look at almost every
IsnĀ“t "highlight and hit delete" exactly what has been implemented since Mozilla 1.3 and works with almost perfect accuracy after you give it a few dozen messages to build up the "good and bad" database with? PEte
Current thread:
- OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Miles Fidelman (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Jack Bates (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Petri Helenius (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Jack Bates (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Paul Timmins (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Petri Helenius (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) JC Dill (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Eric A. Hall (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) just me (Jun 18)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Curtis Maurand (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Andy Dills (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Jack Bates (Jun 19)
- Re: OT: question re. the Volume of unwanted email (fwd) Andy Dills (Jun 19)