nanog mailing list archives
Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:32:17 -0400
In a message written on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:05:17PM -0700, william () elan net wrote:
If what they are doing is not ok, what would you propose?
This is a bit of a sideways step, but... I'm sure a lot of people would like to be able to register a zone and not point it at any nameservers, and not even have it appear in the top level zone files. Many people "sit" on a zone for many reasons, and in most cases having to point them at a nameserver just to register it is pointless and stupid. If a domain could exist in that state, then these domains could just have the lame name servers removed from their records, possibly existing with no nameservers, until the owner pointed them at the right place. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS John Brown (Jun 16)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS william (Jun 16)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS John Brown (Jun 16)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS Leo Bicknell (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS william (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS John Brown (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS william (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS Joe Abley (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS Niels Bakker (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS bmanning (Jun 17)
- Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS william (Jun 16)