![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6
From: Jay Ford <jay-ford () uiowa edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:28:37 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, E.B. Dreger wrote:
PH> One word; multihoming. How many billion different interdomain routing policies do we really need?
Just 1 is enough to cause trouble. Given strict provider-based addressing, multihoming leads to rather nasty interactions between host-based selection of (source address, destination address) & things like the following: o routing policy o anti-spoofing... filtering o quality of service The IETF drafts I've read have not yet offered what I consider viable solutions to those issues. ________________________________________________________________________ Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Technology Services University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 email: jay-ford () uiowa edu, phone: 319-335-5555, fax: 319-335-2951
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Petri Helenius (Jun 12)
- RE: IPv6 David Luyer (Jun 13)
- Re: IPv6 Jared Mauch (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 Eric Gauthier (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 Dave Israel (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 John Palmer (Jun 12)