nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fast TCP?
From: Rob Thomas <robt () cymru com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 23:59:30 -0500 (CDT)
Hi, NANOGers. Did someone say...bot? /me twitches :) ] I am not sure why sending a single large/high speed stream today (>1Gb/s) is ] such an improvement over sending multiple today-streams of data, but I guess ] that is the difference between a get-it-done-right and a get-it-done-now ] mentality. For those who herd bots, this in theory provides the capability to get-it-done-right *AND* get-it-done-now. :/ Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com ASSERT(coffee != empty);
Current thread:
- Fast TCP? Mike Leber (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Allan Liska (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Deepak Jain (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Hank Nussbacher (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Rob Thomas (Jun 04)
- RE: Fast TCP? Deepak Jain (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Mans Nilsson (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? E.B. Dreger (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Scott Francis (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 05)
- Re: Fast TCP? Allan Liska (Jun 04)
- Re: Fast TCP? John Kristoff (Jun 05)