nanog mailing list archives
Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries
From: "Roland Verlander" <rolyv () bigpond com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 15:49:26 +1000
John Brown wrote:
Operators within Net-24 (typically Cable Operators) would do good in setting up a AS112 anycasted DNS server within their networks.
Same with 68/8. A few large cable operators (Cox, Comcast, Charter, RoadRunner, etc.) have netblocks in 68/8. .
Based on a 1,000,000 query (2 min period of time) here are the top 20 /8's that gen bogus queries for RFC-1918 related DNS data. 61637 24.0.0.0 51596 65.0.0.0
Why does 65/8 generate almost as many queries as 24/8?
Current thread:
- Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Roland Verlander (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Justin Shore (Jun 01)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries John Brown (May 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries McBurnett, Jim (Jun 01)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Haesu (Jun 01)
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Sean Donelan (Jun 01)
- RE: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries McBurnett, Jim (Jun 02)
- Re: Net-24 top prefix generating bogus RFC-1918 queries Roland Verlander (May 31)