nanog mailing list archives
Re: North America not interested in IP V6
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol () rvdp org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:30:00 +0200
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 15:04:25 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
The bad news here, or actually good news, is that many ISP's don't register their client /48's.
...
Many other tunnelbrokers exist, check for example freenet6, ipv6.he.net and xs26, who apparently have loads of delegations, these are not to be found in the registries either. Next to that many people still use 6bone space...
Right. And I only counted 2001:600::/23 :-( The other RIPE space has: 2001:600::/23 728 2001:800::/23 213 2001:a00::/23 67 2001:1400::/23 30 2001:1600::/23 0 So a remark like "... no one in Europe is interested either." is nonsense. rvdp
Current thread:
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6, (continued)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Neil J. McRae (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Alexander Koch (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Neil J. McRae (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Marcel Lemmen (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Jeremy T. Bouse (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Jared Mauch (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Alexander Koch (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Neil J. McRae (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Marshall Eubanks (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Ronald van der Pol (Jul 31)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 31)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Ronald van der Pol (Jul 31)
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 31)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Joseph T. Klein (Jul 31)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 David G. Andersen (Jul 31)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Jack Bates (Jul 31)