nanog mailing list archives
Re: North America not interested in IP V6
From: "Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:27:20 +0300
Is there any truth to this anyway? Am I too idealistic to believe that IP numbers will be equally alotted to APNIC, ARIN and RIPE and that this has been the case all along? I mean, there are certain entities in the US with /8:s and these might have a specific advantage, but is this really a country/region thing when it comes to open up previously RESERVED space?
At least with current practise it´s not. RIRs get /8´s from IANA at the pace they need them. When the last /8 goes out, then we´ll be quite close to end of allocatable ipv4 space. Expect that to happen early next decade. Pete
Current thread:
- North America not interested in IP V6 Roy (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Russell Heilling (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Peter Galbavy (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 30)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Nipper, Arnold (Jul 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: North America not interested in IP V6 Daryl G. Jurbala (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Simon Lyall (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Petri Helenius (Jul 29)
- Re: North America not interested in IP V6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jul 29)