nanog mailing list archives
Re: RADb ?
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:16:21 -0700
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:25:18 -0400 (EDT) From: mike harrison <meuon () highertech net> Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu Does anyone really use the RADb ? Worth the $250 per year? Just wondering if it worth renewing..
Registry is worth it, but you might want to think about a free DB (if you are small) or setting up your own with the free irrd software. There is nothing more magical about the RADB than any other member of the IRR. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman () es net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Michael Painter (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Daniel Karrenberg (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability joshua sahala (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Petri Helenius (Jul 18)
- RE: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Darrell Kristof (Jul 16)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Brian Wallingford (Jul 17)
- RE: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Barry Raveendran Greene (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Petri Helenius (Jul 17)
- RADb ? mike harrison (Jul 22)
- Re: RADb ? Kevin Oberman (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Jack Bates (Jul 17)
- RE: Cisco IOS Vulnerability Jay Hennigan (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability now in the news Henry Linneweh (Jul 17)
- Re: Cisco IOS Vulnerability now in the news JC Dill (Jul 17)