nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques

From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:40:02 +0200


* adamm () sihope com (Adam Maloney) [Tue 22 Jul 2003, 15:33 CEST]:

The next worm taking advantage of the latest Windows' vulnerabilities
is more or less inevitable.  Someone somewhere has to be writing it.
So why not include the cisco exploit in the worm payload?


Why would a worm disable a vital component on its path to new infections?


        -- Niels.

Current thread:

Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Adam Maloney (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Niels Bakker (Jul 22)
  - Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
    - Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Jason Frisvold (Jul 22)
    - Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Allan Liska (Jul 22)
    - Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Jason Frisvold (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques McBurnett, Jim (Jul 22)
  - Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques jgraun (Jul 22)
  - Re: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
- RE: Cisco vulnerability and dangerous filtering techniques Austad, Jay (Jul 22)

(Thread continues...)