nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results
From: Richard Irving <rirving () onecall net>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 09:34:01 -0500
alex () yuriev com wrote:
I have this brilliantly simple idea that somehow everyone forgets, while they tout all the new "advanced stuff". Do not introduce yet another name for filtering that works only in some cases. Fix the filtering code so we can filter *anything* at *any packet rate* on *any interface* that pass *any traffic* without bringing the router to its knees.
Already done, however, the only prototype source code is still in test mode, in the same facility as the WMD, in Iraq.... David Kelly has been dispatched by Tony Blair, It -=should=- be here any minute now... :\
Alex
Current thread:
- Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Jason Frisvold (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Jason Frisvold (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Jason Frisvold (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Jason Frisvold (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Jim Duncan (Jul 18)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results alex (Jul 19)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Richard Irving (Jul 19)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Peter Galbavy (Jul 19)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Jason Frisvold (Jul 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Neil J. McRae (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Peter Galbavy (Jul 22)
- RE: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Bob German (Jul 22)
- Re: Cisco Vulnerability Testing Results Peter Galbavy (Jul 22)