![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fixed IOS datestamps?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:03:12 -0500
Scott Call wrote:
For example, 12.0S users are recommended to go to 12.0(25)S, which at least for the GSR is dated April 14, 2003.Do I have the right build of 12.0(25)S or will there be one with a date closer to the revelation of the exploit showing up on the cisco FTP site?
I think that's a typo. 12.0(25)S gave me that it was vulnerable and I needed 12.0(25)S1.
-Jack
Current thread:
- Fixed IOS datestamps? Scott Call (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jack Bates (Jul 17)
- RE: Fixed IOS datestamps? Matthew Kaufman (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jim Duncan (Jul 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Fixed IOS datestamps? Steve Rude (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Niels Bakker (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jared Mauch (Jul 17)
- Re: Fixed IOS datestamps? Jim Duncan (Jul 17)
- RE: Fixed IOS datestamps? Steve Rude (Jul 17)