nanog mailing list archives
Re: Worm / UDP1434
From: "Jack Bates" <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 11:19:38 -0600
From: Freedman David
<snip>
Extreme are apparently assembling an "advisory TAC" on this, from our point of view, since we use the devices to do l3 aggregation (for colo and such) we've used an ACL to try and combat the offending traffic, but its not doing much good.....
<sarcasm> Do you mean to tell me that even my old blocking Cisco equipment actually did something better than an Extreme? </sarcasm> Jack Bates Network Engineer BrightNet Oklahoma
Current thread:
- FW: Worm / UDP1434 Freedman David (Jan 25)
- Re: FW: Worm / UDP1434 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 25)
- Re: Worm / UDP1434 Jack Bates (Jan 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Worm / UDP1434 Freedman David (Jan 25)
- Re: Worm / UDP1434 Neil J. McRae (Jan 25)
- Re: Worm / UDP1434 Andy Walden (Jan 25)
- Re: Worm / UDP1434 K. Scott Bethke (Jan 25)
- management interface accessability (was Re: Worm / UDP1434) Paul Vixie (Jan 25)
- Re: Worm / UDP1434 Neil J. McRae (Jan 25)
- RE: Worm / UDP1434 Freedman David (Jan 26)