![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: fast ethernet limits
From: Scott Granados <scott () wworks net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Actually andy, the oc192 wiccs in the 2600 series work better. :) On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Andy Dills wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Al Rowland wrote:And you are using shielded cable, correct?Nah, I'm guessing he strung bare copper seperated by cotton balls. That's what I like to use in my 27-floor 100tx runs. Andy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Andy Dills 301-682-9972 Xecunet, LLC www.xecu.net xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access
Current thread:
- fast ethernet limits Steve Rude (Jan 10)
- Re: fast ethernet limits Bruce Robertson (Jan 10)
- RE: fast ethernet limits Al Rowland (Jan 10)
- RE: fast ethernet limits Andy Dills (Jan 10)
- RE: fast ethernet limits Scott Granados (Jan 10)
- RE: fast ethernet limits Joel Jaeggli (Jan 10)
- RE: fast Ethernet limits Stephen Fisher (Jan 10)
- RE: fast Ethernet limits Paul Wouters (Jan 10)
- Re: fast ethernet limits Peter E. Fry (Jan 10)
- Re: fast ethernet limits blitz (Jan 10)
- Re: fast ethernet limits Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Crap grounds... blitz (Jan 11)
- RE: fast ethernet limits Al Rowland (Jan 10)
- Re: fast ethernet limits Måns Nilsson (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: fast ethernet limits Jim Segrave (Jan 13)
- Re: fast ethernet limits Bruce Robertson (Jan 10)
- Message not available
- Re: fast ethernet limits blitz (Jan 13)