nanog mailing list archives
Re: US-Asia Peering
From: neil () DOMINO ORG (Neil J. McRae)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:42:07 +0000 (GMT)
Theres an increasing number of "psuedo-wire" connections tho, you could regard these L2 extensions an extension of the switch as a whole making it international.
Thats not really applicable in my view, the psuedo-wire is no different to a long fibre extension and they are only used to connect specific parties not IXP's. Regards, Neil.
Current thread:
- Re: US-Asia Peering, (continued)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Randy Bush (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Randy Bush (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen Stuart (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 09)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Neil J. McRae (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering William B. Norton (Jan 10)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 11)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jan 12)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Paul Vixie (Jan 12)
- Re: US-Asia Peering Bill Woodcock (Jan 13)