![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Trends in network operator security
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:53:44 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 todd.glassey () att net wrote:
Arent these more the attack trends of tier-3 providers and not network operators.
Maybe. I don't see too many tier-1 network operators attacking other tier-1 network operators. The trend I continue to see affecting network operators is customer security incidents, i.e. compromised end-user applications.
Seems to me that The the real issues is when the tier-2 and tier-1 infrastructure come under attack. Otherwise these others are all at the applications layer - which so few on this list are interested in.
There are lots of interesting problems, but I don't know if 2003 is the year. DOS is just too much fun. Route hijacks/bogus origins Compromised infrastructure MLPS alteration Authentication attacks Physical intrusion
Current thread:
- Trends in network operator security Sean Donelan (Jan 08)
- Re: Trends in network operator security batz (Jan 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Trends in network operator security Sean Donelan (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security David Lesher (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Bill Woodcock (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Richard Irving (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security David Lesher (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Pete Kruckenberg (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Sean Donelan (Jan 09)
- Re: Trends in network operator security Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 09)