nanog mailing list archives
Re: Routing preferences question
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:24:32 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 william () elan net wrote:
Does anybody know how/if I can force cisco router to consider ospf route (I'll consider other igp protocol if its possible) from particular source to be prefereble over connected and locally-entered static routes. This is needed for failover project I'm doing. Please note that especially big question is with "connected" route through subinterface, which I can't find any way to override with igp, for static I could at least make them learned igp routes.
Static is simple: just enter an administrative distance (extra argument at the end) that is higher than OSPF's. Connected has a fixed distance, as far as I know. But you can get around this by simply putting more specifics in your IGP. For instance, if the interface has a /24, you let the router elsewehere announce the two /25s that make up this /24.
Current thread:
- Re: .org whois, (continued)
- Re: .org whois Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois Adam McKenna (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois Rob Thomas (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois Jared Mauch (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois Jeff Godin (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois just me (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois Jeff Godin (Jan 29)
- Re: .org whois just me (Jan 29)
- Routing preferences question william (Jan 30)
- Re: Routing preferences question Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 30)
- Re: Routing preferences question Pascal Gloor (Jan 30)
- Re: Routing preferences question Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- RE: Routing preferences question Timothy R. McKee (Jan 30)
- Re: .org whois just me (Jan 29)