nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP to doom us all
From: Jim Deleskie <jdeleski () rci rogers com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:23:44 -0500
Bruce, I agree, while we all need to 'do the right thing' and only announce what we are suppose to, we also need to maintain the right level being paranoid to protect the networks we are responsible for. -Jim -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Pinsky [mailto:bep () whack org] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 5:17 PM To: Jim Deleskie Cc: 'nanog () merit edu' Subject: Re: BGP to doom us all Jim Deleskie wrote:
http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html?tag=fd_lede1_hed Seems the BGP will be the down fall of the internet, the sky is falling
the
sky is falling
What a crock of crap. Knowing who someone is doesn't stop them from causing intentional or unintentional problems. In fact, authentication is more likely to cause people to become complacent wrt their filtering policies. Hey I've authenticated that router so it's going to only send me correct routes. Puleeeaaazzzz... ========== bep
Current thread:
- Re: BGP to doom us all, (continued)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- RE: BGP to doom us all Barry Raveendran Greene (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Sean Donelan (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Robertson (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Randy Bush (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all batz (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP to doom us all Bruce Pinsky (Feb 28)