nanog mailing list archives

Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before

From: "David Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:07:33 -0000

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/29406.html

Interesting.
So they meant they got IDS "hits" hours before anyone posted a full
description of the attacks to bugtraq when they said they had detected
the worm hours before it spread?
That's a novel use of english :)

Current thread:

Bumps on the Net (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours"), (continued)
- - Bumps on the Net (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours") Sean Donelan (Feb 13)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Martin Hannigan (Feb 13)
  - Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Krzysztof Adamski (Feb 13)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Etaoin Shrdlu (Feb 13)
  - The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Sean Donelan (Feb 14)
    - Re: The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Mike Lewinski (Feb 15)
    - Re: The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) Peter Salus (Feb 15)
    - Re: The minutes seem like hours (was Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before) William Warren (Feb 15)
- RE: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Terry Baranski (Feb 23)
  - Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Glen Fillmore (Feb 24)
    - Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before David Howe (Feb 24)
    - Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before Scott Francis (Feb 25)
- Re: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before hostmaster (Feb 13)