nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet law
From: "Eric M. Fiterman" <efiterman () pittsburghfbi org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:39:47 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, JC Dill wrote:
At 11:01 AM 12/30/2003, you wrote:when will we see the FBI, and other local police in the other countries send the script kiddies to the JAILL so we can use the internet without too muchThe cost of tracking down and prosecuting them, and the difficulty in proving that what they are doing is against the law, is significant. LEOs don't understand how to investigate and prosecute criminal network behavior, and they have other crimes they DO understand that presently have a higher priority. It will take a lot of money and education to the LEO community before this will become a priority.
I wanted to jump in and clarify a few things. First of all, we DO understand how to investigate these kinds of crimes. The cases may be more difficult because of the jurisdictional issues that arise, but we still work them. Internet/Cyber crime is one of the FBI's top investigative priorities, and the FBI is dedicating a lot of resources and personnel to prosecute Cyber criminals. Also keep in mind that the backgrounds of FBI Special Agents are changing; new Agents have more technical breadth and experience than they did before, and are well-suited for cyber investigations. -Eric
Current thread:
- Internet law John Obi (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law Joe Abley (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law JC Dill (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law Eric M. Fiterman (Dec 31)
- Re: Internet law Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Dec 31)
- Re: Internet law Alexei Roudnev (Dec 31)
- Re: Internet law Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law Joe Abley (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law Richard Irving (Dec 30)
- Re: Internet law Tom (UnitedLayer) (Dec 30)