nanog mailing list archives
RE: Stupid .org registry code change
From: "Alon Tirosh" <atirosh () interactiveedge com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:37:26 -0500
Strangely enough, PIR doesn't recognize that one... Google-mining seems to indicate that its TUCOWS/OPENSRS, but I wont swear to that. As for actually contacting someone to get it fixed, considering past experience I think nothing short of a public outcry is going to draw attention to the problem, and whois issues might be just a little to esoteric for NYT/WP/CNET coverage... -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Michael Lewinski Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:19 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Stupid .org registry code change During the recent changes to .org, whois stopped being useful for what I need.
Sponsoring Registrar:R11-LROR
All I really want to know is the Registrar's name/URL to tell my client so they can modify their nameservers. Does anyone have: 1) A URL to the table that will allow me to lookup a name from the above code (or better, a hack to whois that will do said lookup for me)? 2) The e-mail address where I should my suggestion that the person who came up with this brilliant scheme needs to pursue a new career in a non-IT related field? TIA, Mike
Current thread:
- Stupid .org registry code change Michael Lewinski (Dec 22)
- Re: Stupid .org registry code change Tim Wilde (Dec 22)
- Re: Stupid .org registry code change Tim Wilde (Dec 22)
- Re: Stupid .org registry code change Ray Wong (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Stupid .org registry code change Alon Tirosh (Dec 22)
- Re: Stupid .org registry code change Tim Wilde (Dec 22)