nanog mailing list archives
Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:54:09 +0100
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 03:37:00AM -0700, John Brown (CV) wrote:
telling spammers 4xx or 5xx doesn't matter, they don't listen.
Exactly this is the flawed point about returning 4xx. They produce only collateral damage, but don't hit their target at all. Regards, Daniel
Current thread:
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders, (continued)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Joe Abley (Dec 01)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Paul Vixie (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Daniel Roesen (Dec 01)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders John Brown (CV) (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Daniel Roesen (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Randy Bush (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Paul Vixie (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Richard Cox (Dec 02)
- Re: incorrect spam setups cause spool messes on forwarders Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 02)