nanog mailing list archives
Re: Authority
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:16:34 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 william () elan net wrote:
P.S. Note to other - this thread may have happened because of recent thread on layer42 on inet-access mail list. While I generally answer accusations, I'm not the one who starts such threads and do not think its approriate for nanog mail list, so this will be my only message here.
I think you've made plenty of accusations without basis, so to quote Richard Cox "Then you would appear to have a circular argument to contend with." Don't go around accusing people of malfeasance if you're not prepared to be confronted with your own wrongdoing (IE your own hijacked blocks), or to face the criticism of others when you're wrong. I generally try to stay out of these types of arguements, but I think that you should probably focus your efforts on something more productive than defaming other ISPs.
Current thread:
- Re: Authority, (continued)
- Re: Authority Christian Malo (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Jeff S Wheeler (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Richard Cox (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Blaxthos (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority jon bennett (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Tom (UnitedLayer) (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority william (Dec 10)
- Re: Authority Henry Linneweh (Dec 10)
- Root Authority Doug Luce (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority Randy Bush (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority bill (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: Root Authority Joe Abley (Dec 15)