nanog mailing list archives
Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 00:52:09 +0200
Adi Linden wrote:
I am not talking about sending bills for some outrageous amount due to excess bandwidth used. Instead cut off when a certain bandwidth threshold has been exceeded. If the bandwidth was used purposely and legitametly, buy more bandwidth, otherwise fix your PC.This only works if the guy next door is not selling UNLIMITED 512kbps connection
for the same amount of $$ than your limited one.(assuming you would actually be telling your customers about it, if you wouldn´t
then they would not fix their PCs) According to my experience, annoyance (slower speed) is not enough to makeJoe User to do things immediately. Only when you severely limit the utility of
a connection, they´ll start doing the right things. Pete
Current thread:
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Jamie Reid (Dec 03)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Steve Francis (Dec 03)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Jeff Kell (Dec 03)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Adi Linden (Dec 03)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Joe Abley (Dec 03)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Sean Donelan (Dec 04)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Joe Abley (Dec 04)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Adi Linden (Dec 04)
- NANOG spam survey Doug Luce (Dec 04)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Petri Helenius (Dec 04)
- Re: Firewall stateful handling of ICMP packets Joe Abley (Dec 03)