nanog mailing list archives
Re: Email virus protection
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:25:43 -0500
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Just like what some viruses do you mean?
A zipped virus or a renamed virus to say exd or dat is less likely to get an infection hold than .pif, .bat, or .exe
-Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Email virus protection, (continued)
- Re: Email virus protection Karsten W. Rohrbach (Aug 20)
- Re: Email virus protection just me (Aug 20)
- Re: Email virus protection Petri Helenius (Aug 20)
- Re: Email virus protection JC Dill (Aug 20)
- Re: Email virus protection Lou Katz (Aug 20)
- Re: Email virus protection JC Dill (Aug 20)
- Re: Email virus protection Jack Bates (Aug 21)
- Re: Email virus protection Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 21)
- Re: Email virus protection Jack Bates (Aug 21)
- Re: Email virus protection Crist Clark (Aug 21)
- Re: Email virus protection Dave Howe (Aug 21)
- email virus ==> over the top neal rauhauser (Aug 21)
- Re: email virus ==> over the top Mike Tancsa (Aug 21)
- Re: email virus ==> over the top Joel Jaeggli (Aug 21)
- Re: email virus ==> over the top Steve Carter (Aug 21)
- Re: email virus ==> over the top JC Dill (Aug 21)
- Re: email virus ==> over the top Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 21)
- Re: email virus ==> over the top neal rauhauser (Aug 21)