nanog mailing list archives

Re: microsoft.com

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 22:43:52 -0400

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 17:46:56 PDT, Avleen Vig said:

To the point where it doesn't hurt my network, hurt other people, or
cause me an increase in costs, I won't be going out of my way to defend
MS. Frankly, it might be the only way they'll learn.
Imaging the havok if every Windows virus tried to attack MS.


Well, the majority of the recent worms have gotten loose on MS's corporate net
and caused enough disruption to make the news, and there was the time that
windowsupdate.microsoft.com got nailed by CodeRed...

Oh.. wait.. you meant *intentionally* tried to attack....

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

RE: microsoft.com, (continued)
- RE: microsoft.com Huopio Kauto (Aug 15)
  - RE: microsoft.com up (Aug 15)
- RE: microsoft.com Pranav Sheth (Aug 15)
- RE: microsoft.com Vachon, Scott (Aug 15)
- RE: microsoft.com McBurnett, Jim (Aug 15)
- RE: microsoft.com Jason Baugher (Aug 15)
  - RE: microsoft.com Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (Aug 15)
    - Re: microsoft.com Crist Clark (Aug 15)
    - Re: microsoft.com Jack Bates (Aug 15)
    - Re: microsoft.com Avleen Vig (Aug 15)
    - Re: microsoft.com Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 15)
    - Re: microsoft.com Danny McPherson (Aug 15)