nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft.com attack?
From: Dan Armstrong <dan () beanfield com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:53:23 -0400
I wouldn't put it past Microsoft to make a patch so poorly written, it would actually cause all patched machines to attack the mothership. :-) Adam Maloney wrote:
Yeah, seeing the same here - it's been flaky for us for the last 30 minutes while we've been trying it. I wonder if it's related to this messages.zip / admin@ thing that's all over the place today. I was just thinking the other day, wouldn't it be funny if there was a worm that had infected machines attack windowsupdate.microsoft.com so you couldn't patch? :) I haven't confirmed that this is the problem, but it seems likely. Adam Maloney Systems Administrator Sihope Communications On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Jason Frisvold wrote:Anyone aware of an attack on www.microsoft.com? I had a customer machine that was attacking it, looks like either a bug in Microsoft's SP4 (coincidentally this started the day after this was installed) or there's some new(?) worm of some sort causing this ?? Thanks! -- --------------------------- Jason H. Frisvold Backbone Engineering Supervisor Penteledata Engineering friz () corp ptd net RedHat Engineer - RHCE # 807302349405893 Cisco Certified - CCNA # CSCO10151622 MySQL Core Certified - ID# 205982910 --------------------------- "Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world." -- Albert Einstein [1879-1955]
Current thread:
- Microsoft.com attack? Jason Frisvold (Aug 01)
- Re: Microsoft.com attack? Adam Maloney (Aug 01)
- Re: Microsoft.com attack? Dan Armstrong (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft.com attack? Dennis Wong (Aug 01)
- RE: Microsoft.com attack? Jason Frisvold (Aug 01)
- Re: Microsoft.com attack? Adam Maloney (Aug 01)