nanog mailing list archives
Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:51:52 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Or the dumb [wannabee] IT guy runs some telnet/ftp/filesharing service without passwords and its ok for the whole world to access the private system coz its his fault?
there are other actions to be taken... termination being high on that list. (of employment, atleast initially)
Current thread:
- firewall == network diaper, ranting in HTML, (continued)
- Message not available
- firewall == network diaper, ranting in HTML neal rauhauser 402-301-9555 (Aug 14)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Mans Nilsson (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Mans Nilsson (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Jack Bates (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Petri Helenius (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Niels Bakker (Aug 13)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 13)
- RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Bob German (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Jack Bates (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus mike harrison (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Jack Bates (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Jack Bates (Aug 12)
- Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Petri Helenius (Aug 12)