nanog mailing list archives
Re: RPC errors
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:24:40 -0500
Jim Shankland wrote:
On the not so bright side, I'm getting a steady stream of port 135 SYNs from my fellow Comcast customers (i.e., presumably on my side of Comcast's filters), which may mean the horses have mostly already left the barn.
You'll see a lot of this. Establishing blocks in the local networks is more time consuming than it's worth. Blocks are usually only in place temporarily while other business practices are carried out; as any good neighbor tries not to harrass fellow networks. Once decontamination starts and users are fixed or suspended from service, blocks will usually be removed and the world goes back to normal.
My own network has a two week deadline, although I'm gunning for being done this week.
-Jack
Current thread:
- RE: RPC errors, (continued)
- RE: RPC errors Bob German (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Michael Painter (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Brennan_Murphy (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Rob Thomas (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Mike Damm (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Mark Segal (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Jack Bates (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Randy Bush (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors John Palmer (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Jim Shankland (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Jack Bates (Aug 12)
- Re: RPC errors Jack Bates (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Dan Hollis (Aug 12)
- Re: RPC errors Henry Linneweh (Aug 12)
- Re: RPC errors - DDoS on the 16th? Eric Kuhnke (Aug 12)