nanog mailing list archives
Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but.
From: Scott Granados <scott () wworks net>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 11:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
I've captured this guy here actually directed at me. <thank goodness for pine:)> It appears to attach itself as message.zip not sure if it attaches using other names. On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Drew Weaver wrote:
I have had like 4 users call and tell me that they're receiving email from admin@ourdomainname with a unidentified attachment, possibly a worm that exploits the new Microsoft vulnerability last week, all 4 of these people reported that their updated this morning antivirus software missed it. FYI.
Current thread:
- maybe this should be on sec focus but. Drew Weaver (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Damian Gerow (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Scott Granados (Aug 01)
- RE: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Bob German (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Forrest Houston (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Patrick_McAllister (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Mike Tancsa (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Joe Boyce (Aug 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Drew Weaver (Aug 01)
- Re: maybe this should be on sec focus but. Gregory Hicks (Aug 01)