nanog mailing list archives
Re: Server Redundancy
From: Gerald <gcoon () inch com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 14:36:39 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Allan Liska wrote:
Two things to keep in mind: VRRP is not a load balancing solution, it is a failover solution
You are very correct sir. :-) The load balancing part from the same project is: http://www.bsdshell.net/hut_loadd.html
and (AFAIK) VRRP only operates within-network.
I haven't seen anything that said one way or another on this part. I think we would have to know more about the network that is considering deploying this to know if the IP addressing could be re-routed to the backup interface that comes up in the event of a failure. G
Current thread:
- Server Redundancy Jason Greenberg (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Allan Liska (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Jason Dixon (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy John Kinsella (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Jason Dixon (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Gerald (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Allan Liska (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Gerald (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Andy Dills (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Allan Liska (Aug 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Server Redundancy Ejay Hire (Aug 06)
- RE: Server Redundancy Austad, Jay (Aug 06)
- RE: Server Redundancy Gerald (Aug 06)
- Re: Server Redundancy Jack Bates (Aug 06)
- RE: Server Redundancy variable (Aug 07)
- Re: Server Redundancy Nathan J. Mehl (Aug 07)
- RE: Server Redundancy Gerald (Aug 06)
- RE: Server Redundancy Austad, Jay (Aug 06)
- RE: Server Redundancy Gerald (Aug 06)
- RE: Server Redundancy Simon Hamilton-Wilkes (Aug 06)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Server Redundancy Allan Liska (Aug 06)