nanog mailing list archives
Re: Humidity ranges?
From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 00:00:25 -0400
On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 23:35:24 -0400 Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu> wrote:
Todd Mitchell - lists wrote:| and when I should | complain to the datacenter operators? (References I can point to would | be nice.) When your equipment starts to rust ;) I don't have any technical references, but I think that anything over 65% is probably too much. Most facilities I have equipment in do not exceed that mark.It isn't a *huge* issue (within reason) unless you have printers around and the inherent paper. Big lasers are notoriously finicky about humidity, which directly affects the paper quality.
If you are running lots of mag tape, humidity > 60 % starts to really increase tape and head wear. If new tape heads are part of your regular operating budget, I would keep the humidity < 50 %. Regards Marshall Eubanks
Otherwise, just keep it well below the dewpoint :-) Jeff
Current thread:
- Humidity ranges? Steve Francis (Aug 04)
- RE: Humidity ranges? Todd Mitchell - lists (Aug 04)
- RE: Humidity ranges? N. Richard Solis (Aug 04)
- Re: Humidity ranges? Jeff Kell (Aug 04)
- Re: Humidity ranges? Marshall Eubanks (Aug 04)
- Re: Humidity ranges? Frank Louwers (Aug 04)
- Re: Humidity ranges? Richard Parker (Aug 04)
- RE: Humidity ranges? Todd Mitchell - lists (Aug 04)