nanog mailing list archives
Re: dry pair
From: Ray Wong <rayw () rayw net>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:51:50 -0700
Good luck getting one from anything but and old-bell. New LECs tend to think only in terms of the switch side, since the last mile belongs to the ILEC anyway. Even the ones that know it don't want to support it, as they can't do any remote testing when it dies, requiring local "wire and cable" staff. Use old-bell terms, "dry pair" is very much a network admin's term. "alarm circuit," "off-premise extension line," (like if you had your own PBX and need another office to run off it), "series 1100" line, or maybe LADS. On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:08:10AM -0500, Austad, Jay wrote:
Does anyone know to go about getting Qwest or a CLEC to patch through a dry pair between two buildings connected to the same CO? When I called to order one, no one knew what I was talking about. -jay
-- Ray Wong rayw () rayw net
Current thread:
- dry pair Austad, Jay (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair Rick Ernst (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair David Meyer (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair Ray Wong (Aug 29)
- RE: dry pair Randy Neals (ORION) (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair Wayne (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair Dan Hollis (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair Wayne (Aug 30)
- Re: dry pair Dan Hollis (Aug 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: dry pair Pendergrass, Greg (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pair William Warren (Aug 29)
- RE: dry pairs Joel Jaeggli (Aug 29)
- Re: dry pairs David Meyer (Aug 29)
- RE: dry pair Ejay Hire (Aug 29)
- RE: dry pair Austad, Jay (Aug 29)
(Thread continues...)