nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fun new policy at AOL
From: Roland Perry <nanog () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:51:06 -0400
In article <B9D3F155-D971-11D7-828E-000A956885D4 () crocker com>, Matthew Crocker <matthew () crocker com> writes
ISPs would need to contact AOL, provide valid contact into and accept some sort of AUP (I shall not spam AOL...) and then be allowed to connect from their IPs. AOL could kick that mail server off later if they determine they are spamming.
Next time I'm lobbying about "the cost of Spam", I'll have to remember to add in all this activity as well as the end user perspective (and the more traditional "we need to buy bigger servers and pipes" stuff). -- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL, (continued)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Aaron Dewell (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Joel Jaeggli (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL David Lesher (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL John Palmer (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Richard D G Cox (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Roland Perry (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Matthew Crocker (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Paul Vixie (Aug 28)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Paul Vixie (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Joseph McDonald (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Omachonu Ogali (Aug 29)
- Re: Fun new policy at AOL Bruce Pinsky (Aug 29)