nanog mailing list archives
Re: Time to bring back "Connected Status"
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 02:14:44 +0200
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 07:00:50PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
For networks which are announced on the Internet, add a Connected field to the regional address registries listing the AS Number(s) which could announce the network.
Well, this is exactly what route objects are for. Can't get too much simpler than that. The problem is that you have to protect the authoritative database(s) in order to avoid bogus origin declarations. RIPE does that quite nicely with their maintainer concept. A maintainer protecting and IP address range (inetnum) does also protect the creation of route objects for this IP range (but authority for routing information can be delegated to some other entity by using mnt-routes attribute). Without this kind of protection scheme[1], route origin documentation becomes worthless. See RADB with the hundreds and thousands of automatically generated "proxy route objects" which some people seem to believe being a great idea. Then again, I've pretty much given up hope that ISPs filter their customers properly. Filtering customers means losing money to the competition, sadly. Best regards, Daniel [1] http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/faq/database/route-creation-checks.html
Current thread:
- Time to bring back "Connected Status" Sean Donelan (Apr 28)
- RE: Time to bring back "Connected Status" Alexander Kiwerski (Apr 28)
- Re: Time to bring back "Connected Status" Daniel Roesen (Apr 28)
- Re: Time to bring back "Connected Status" bmanning (Apr 29)