nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam thread
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:27:39 -0500
Susan Harris wrote:
I agree that it's a more appropriate list. Yet I do wonder if the discussion (at least in part), and particularly the original thread before the various sub-threads on SC and blacklisting started is not appropriate for nanog.Can we please stop the spam thread ("Open relays and open proxies") and take it to a more appropriate list:
In particular, I feel issues with proxies, trojans, etc and how they are dealt with between networks, and their foreseeable threat to the infrastructure itself is relevant to the following the the charter:
"# Discuss specific implementation issues which require cooperation and coordination among network service providers to ensure the stability of overall service to the network users.
# Serve as a focal point for other common activities of the participants.# Promote and coordinate interconnection of networks within North America and to other continents."
-Jack
Current thread:
- Spam thread Susan Harris (Apr 25)
- Re: Spam thread Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Re: Spam thread Jared Mauch (Apr 25)
- Re: Spam thread Jack Bates (Apr 25)