nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open relays and open proxies
From: John Payne <john () sackheads org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:17:56 -0400
--On Friday, April 25, 2003 3:00 PM -0400 Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
The tools inside spam assassin, baysean(sp?) filtering, fingerprint checks of known spam messages, filtering of known spam identifiers is both more effective at actually catching the spam, and it's also much better at not wacking legitimate messages. Listing services are yesterday's technology, and frankly, have failed in their end goal. The community needs to push forward with more advanced tools, like the fingerprinting software.
I agree in general, but don't tar all dnsbl's with the spamcop and other subjective-list 's brush
Current thread:
- Re: Open relays and open proxies, (continued)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Joe Abley (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Niels Bakker (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Curtis Maurand (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies bdragon (Apr 26)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Curtis Maurand (Apr 27)
- RE: Open relays and open proxies Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Nathan J. Mehl (Apr 30)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Nathan J. Mehl (Apr 30)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Leo Bicknell (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 25)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jeff Kell (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Paul Vixie (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Rob Thomas (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jeff Kell (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies John Payne (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Jack Bates (Apr 24)
- Re: Open relays and open proxies Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 25)