nanog mailing list archives
Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:02:26 -0400
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:59:25AM -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote: [snip]
There are several networks out there using Cisco devices to achieve over six 9's availability, and the way they do that is by extensive procedure review and rigorous software testing.
[snip] Tear this page out of the notebook and highlight it. Even a small shop that "can't afford" a testbed or lab can dramatically reduce problems with formal procedures borrowed from software engineering. Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- dual router vs. single "reliable" router David Barak (Apr 10)
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 10)
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router David Barak (Apr 10)
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router Stephen Sprunk (Apr 10)
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router Stephen Sprunk (Apr 10)
- Message not available
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router Joe Provo (Apr 10)
- Message not available
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router dre (Apr 10)
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 10)
- Re: dual router vs. single "reliable" router John L Lee (Apr 11)