nanog mailing list archives
Re: layer 3 switch debate
From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:08:19 -0400 (EDT)
Does anyone know who is actually running "switches" in the core? The only example I'm aware of is Telocity, and I'm not sure if they are still doing that. They use(d?) Foundry gear. -- Charles Sprickman spork () inch com On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake "ip dude" <ipdude () cattle-today com>so it is your opinion that a Catalyst 6509 (i.e. Layer 3 switch) is equivalentto a 7206 or GSR? Of course, this is in regard to 'core' routing device in the middle of a national IP network. This network in question just happens to utilize a lot of GE LH interconnections. Different devices have different strengths and weaknesses; if they were equivalent, one of them wouldn't exist. I personally have no opinion on whether a Catalyst 6500 makes a good "core router" vs. a GSR. That depends on what best fits your technical and business requirements, your staff's experience, the features available, other devices in your network, etc. Nobody else can answer that question for you. S
Current thread:
- layer 3 switch debate ip dude (Sep 26)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 26)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: layer 3 switch debate ip dude (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Charles Sprickman (Sep 27)
- JUNO.COM Richard Irving (Sep 27)
- Re: layer 3 switch debate Stephen Sprunk (Sep 27)