nanog mailing list archives
Re: AP IX locations
From: Dorian Kim <dorian () blackrose org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:43:19 -0400
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:30:42PM -0500, keichii wrote:
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () DOMINO ORG>I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP in the AP region that would enable me to interconnect with as many AP carriers as possible.Above.net and AT&T are your best bets for operations based in the Americas. Above has a .jp IX/colo that is almost "the" best connected place in AP. ATT and Above.net provide almost 80 to 90% of the bandwidth from the Americas to AP.
A handful of incumbent telcos of AP region countries as well as few others operate multigigabit IP networks across the Pacific. I don't think they'd agree with your statement. -dorian
Current thread:
- AP IX locations Neil J. McRae (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations keichii (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Michael C. Wu (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations German Martinez (Sep 26)
- RE: AP IX locations Barry Raveendran Greene (Sep 29)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 29)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations keichii (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: AP IX locations James Spenceley (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations David Luyer (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations David Conrad (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations German Martinez (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Lane Patterson (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations ren (Sep 26)