nanog mailing list archives

Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings

From: Huopio Kauto <Kauto.Huopio () ficora fi>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:49:15 +0300


How about just plainly blocking the most obvious holes, that is
telnet and POP? If someone wants a direct telnet connection to a 
route server or something similar - open a hole with a web-based tool?
Ok, then you say all unencrypted www traffic with plain username/pw..
SSH'ing everything back to home base is quite useful :)

--Kauto

Current thread:

Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Tony Rall (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Tony Rall (Sep 22)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 23)
  - Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings JC Dill (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Huopio Kauto (Sep 23)
  - Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Greg Maxwell (Sep 23)