nanog mailing list archives
Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic
From: "John M. Brown" <john () chagresventures com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:58:10 -0700
Not my villains. :) More the Internet's villains :) or AS 112's Villians I left out the AS string lables as a excersise for the reader. SBC could solve this with some simple changes on their network DNS system. On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 04:53:30PM -0500, Peter Salus wrote:
It seems to me that some folks may not realize who owns John Brown's 5 AS villains. 4134 is Chinanet 3352 is Ibernet 7132 is Southwestern Bell and 5673 ) 5676 ) are both SBC As Southwestern Bell is a part of SBC, it looks like SBC is a major villain where RFC-1918 DNS traffic is concerned. Peter
Current thread:
- Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic John M. Brown (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic Peter Salus (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic John M. Brown (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic Sean Donelan (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic Paul Vixie (Sep 15)
- RE: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic Sameer R. Manek (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic Henry Yen (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic John M. Brown (Sep 14)
- Time to update RFC1912? (was Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic) Sean Donelan (Sep 14)
- Re: Top AS Offenders causing RFC-1918 DNS traffic Peter Salus (Sep 14)