nanog mailing list archives
BGP Default Route
From: "Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi () eurekaggn com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 14:18:15 -0400
I was wondering how people tend to generate default routes to customers running bgp. Is it from the aggregation router that customers are directly connected to, or from one or more core/border routers? If one is using a default route to null 0 on aggregation routers that maintain a full bgp table (assuming that the full table represents all destinations on the Internet, and therefore dumping traffic to a destination not in that table), and assuming Cisco routers using the default-information originate command, then as long as the router is up and it's bgp sessions with peers are up, it is going to send the default route regardless of it's ability to forward traffic to external destinations. The same goes for the default route announced by a core/border router, if it's default is generated by the null route. Is an assumption made that with a good network design, no router will every be without valid routing information, with the exception of a complete failure of the router? Guy H. Lupi
Current thread:
- BGP Default Route Lupi, Guy (Sep 14)
- Re: BGP Default Route Mike Leber (Sep 14)
- Re: BGP Default Route Jesper Skriver (Sep 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: BGP Default Route Lupi, Guy (Sep 14)
- RE: BGP Default Route Mike Leber (Sep 14)
- Re: BGP Default Route Joe Abley (Sep 14)
- RE: BGP Default Route Lupi, Guy (Sep 14)
- Re: BGP Default Route Henry Yen (Sep 14)
- RE: BGP Default Route Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 14)
- RE: BGP Default Route Martin, Christian (Sep 15)
- Re: BGP Default Route Jesper Skriver (Sep 16)