nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T NYC
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:31:31 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 alex () yuriev com wrote:
That's the part I can't figure out without some lab time either, but obviously you can tweak this setup to _statically_ do whatever it is you need, the only question is what happens when something goes down.
route-map internal-link permit 10 match blah set metric +10 do blah
Yes, now I see it. Under normal circumstances this doesn't make sense since IBGP doesn't "see" the infrastructure between to BGP routers, but in this setup each router adds to the MED metric so it works more or less the same as an OSPF or IS-IS metric. Iljitsch van Beijnum
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 02)
- Re: AT&T NYC Clayton Fiske (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Jesper Skriver (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Jesper Skriver (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC bdragon (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 03)
- Re: AT&T NYC Petri Helenius (Sep 02)