nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP address fee??
From: <bdragon () gweep net>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 17:38:19 -0400 (EDT)
Shane: I think an important question would be what level of service are they buying. Including 255 address with a T3 would be very reasonable, less so with a T1, not very reasonable with DSL, and ridiculous with a dial-up account.
How is usage need in any way related to circuit size? This kind of allocation policy amazes me. A dialup that can justify a /24 is no different than an OC3 customer who can't. Each customer should (only) get the space they can justify, and circuit size is not a justification.
Current thread:
- Re: IP address fee??, (continued)
- Re: IP address fee?? Christopher Schulte (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen Sprunk (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? Forrest W. Christian (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? Forrest W. Christian (Sep 05)
- Message not available
- Re: IP address fee?? Ted Fischer (Sep 06)
- Re: IP address fee?? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? David Schwartz (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? cw (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)