![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: AMS-IX problems
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:11:26 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
There seem to be large scale problems at the AMS-IX. BGP sessions with peers keep oscillating. Since their own addresses keep jumping all over the place, it is not possible to reach anyone over the AMS-IX tech list.
I have disabled all AMS-IX peerings for the networks I manage, and I suggest everyone who is present there looks in to doing the same.
According to Henk Steenman (CTO AMS-IX) everything is back to normal operations. AMS-IX is still investigating what happened.
I wouldn't call having to disable one link in the ring between the four locations because spanning tree wouldn't converge otherwise "back to normal", but yes, the AMS-IX is back to working order, as the large number of backlogged "we are experiencing an outage" messages on the AMS-IX mailinglist that just came in indicate... It's very interesting to see the traffic stats at http://www.ams-ix.net/hugegraph.html Usually, incoming and outgoing traffic is the same. But during this problem, much more traffic went out than came in. Iljitsch van Beijnum
Current thread:
- AMS-IX problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Nipper, Arnold (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Mike Hughes (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Nipper, Arnold (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems James A. T. Rice (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Nipper, Arnold (Oct 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: AMS-IX problems Neil J. McRae (Oct 23)
- RE: AMS-IX problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Neil J. McRae (Oct 23)
- Re: AMS-IX problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 23)
- RE: AMS-IX problems Iljitsch van Beijnum (Oct 23)