nanog mailing list archives
Re: question concerning traceroute?
From: "David Howe" <DaveHowe () gmx co uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:44:25 +0100
at Thursday, October 17, 2002 3:58 PM, alex () yuriev com <alex () yuriev com> was seen to say:
Unless you did "- g",Not correct. -g specifies loose source routing on the way *there*, not back.
No, you can get both if you ping *yourself* with the actual destination as -g. this gives you both legs of the trip.
Current thread:
- question concerning traceroute? Darrell Carley (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Nipper, Arnold (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Jared Mauch (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? David Howe (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Nipper, Arnold (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? alex (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? k claffy (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Arnold Nipper (Oct 17)
- Re: question concerning traceroute? Sean Donelan (Oct 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: question concerning traceroute? Kris Foster (Oct 17)