Re: Who does source address validation? (was Re: what's that smell?)

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () telecomplete co uk>]

On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> [ On Thursday, October 10, 2002 at 11:53:18 (-0400), Richard A Steenbergen wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: Who does source address validation? (was Re: what's that smell?)
> >
> >
> > I'm sure we can all agree on at least the concept that sourcing packets
> > from an address which cannot receive a reply is at least potentially
> > useful, for example to avoid DoS against a critical piece of
> > infrastructure. Would it make people feel better if there was a specific
> > seperate non-routed address space reserved for "router generated messages
> > which don't want replies"? Why?
>
> Why not just use 127.0.0.1?!?!?!?!?

and thats different from rfc1918 because?