nanog mailing list archives
Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media
From: "Peter E. Fry" <pfry () swbell net>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 13:38:55 -0500
Ralph Doncaster wrote:
What, you don't use a static default route on your end hosts? Are you one of those crazy types that run RIP on your IIS/NT servers?
Last time I looked (a few years back), M$ Windows [whatever] ran RIP receive-only whether you wanted it to or not. Made working with old Pipelines (which ran RIP send whether you wanted them to or not) kind of a bear. Peter E. Fry
Current thread:
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media, (continued)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Christopher L. Morrow (Oct 06)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Pete Templin (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media alex (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Jared Mauch (Oct 06)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Petri Helenius (Oct 11)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media alex (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media jlewis (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Majdi S. Abbas (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Ralph Doncaster (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Peter E. Fry (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Pete Templin (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Mark Kent (Oct 06)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Gregory Urban (Oct 08)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Clayton Fiske (Oct 06)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Ralph Doncaster (Oct 07)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 06)
- Re: iBGP next hop and multi-access media alex (Oct 07)